Adobe Acrobat Pro DC 2018.011.20040 + Crack [Torrent/Magnet] Free Download Acrobat DC (former Adobe Acrobat XI Pro) is the completely reimagined desktop. Adobe premiere crack torrent. Switch easily between Premiere Pro and After Effects or Audition with Adobe Dynamic Link, and work seamlessly with other Creative Cloud apps, including Photoshop, Illustrator, and Media Encoder. Access footage and Motion Graphics templates from Adobe Stock right in the app. Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2019 Crack is an impressive software that will help you Creating videos that are awesome and also stunning. By using this Adobe product the movie quality and also production is guaranteed, and you do not have to worry anymore on your video and how it will look. Release Website: CracksNow.com Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2019 13.0.0 (x64) + Crack [CracksNow] Bring your next big thing to screens everywhere. Turn raw footage into flawless productions with Premiere Pro CC, the industry-leading video editing software.
Residence | Los Angeles, California |
---|---|
Nationality | Germany |
Alma mater | Carnegie Mellon University |
Scientific career | |
Fields | Artificial Intelligence, Robotics |
Institutions | University of Southern California |
Doctoral advisor | Reid Simmons |
Sven Koenig is a full professor in computer science at the University of Southern California. He received an M.S. degree in computer science from the University of California at Berkeley in 1991 and a Ph.D. degree in computer science from Carnegie Mellon University in 1997, advised by Reid Simmons.
Research[edit]
Koenig is an artificial intelligence and roboticsresearcher who develops techniques for planning and learning under uncertainty and time constraints, both for single agents and teams of agents. His research often combines ideas from artificial intelligence and robotics with ideas from other disciplines, such as decision theory, theoretical computer science, operations research and economics.
Scientific Achievements[edit]
In his pre-dissertation work, Koenig applied Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) to artificial intelligence planning. The standard textbook in artificial intelligence, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (second edition), states 'The connection between MDPs and AI planning problems was made first by Sven Koenig (1991), who showed how probabilistic STRIPS operators provide a compact representation for transition models.'
Koenig's dissertation on 'Goal-Directed Acting with Incomplete Information' describes a robust robot navigation architecture based on partially observable Markov decision process models. His papers on the subject are highly cited due to their pioneering nature and the subsequent wide adoption of probabilistic robot navigation approaches.
After his dissertation, Koenig laid a broad foundation for incremental heuristic search in artificial intelligence with the development of search algorithms such as Lifelong Planning A* (LPA*), D* Lite, Adaptive A* (AA*) and Fringe-Saving A* (FSA*). The ideas behind his incremental heuristic search algorithm D* Lite, for example, have been incorporated by others into a variety of path planning systems in robotics, including Carnegie Mellon University's winning entry in the DARPA Urban Challenge.
Koenig is also known for his work on real-time search, ant robots, probabilistic planning with nonlinear utility functions, development and analysis of robot-navigation methods (goal-directed navigation in unknown terrain, localization, coverage and mapping), agent coordination based on cooperative auctions, and any-angle path planning.
Professional Activities[edit]
Sven Computer Wikipedia
Koenig was conference co-chair of the 2004 International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, program co-chair of the 2005 International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems and program co-chair of the 2007 and 2008 AAAI Nectar programs. He served or serves on the editorial boards of several artificial intelligence and robotics journals, on the board of directors of the Robotics: Science and Systems Foundation, on the advisory boards of the Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research and Americas School on Agents and Multiagent Systems, and on the steering committees of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling and the Symposium on Abstraction, Reformulation, and Approximation.
Honors and awards[edit]
Koenig is the recipient of an ACM Recognition of Service Award, an NSF CAREER award, an IBM Faculty Partnership Award, a Charles Lee Powell Foundation Award, a Raytheon Faculty Fellowship Award, a Mellon Mentoring Award, a Fulbright Fellowship, the IEEE Computer Science and Engineering Undergraduate Teaching Award, and the Tong Leong Lim Pre-Doctoral Prize from the University of California at Berkeley.
Selected References[edit]
S. Koenig. Goal-Directed Acting with Incomplete Information. PhD thesis, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh (Pennsylvania), 1997.
R. Simmons and S. Koenig. Probabilistic Robot Navigation in Partially Observable Environments. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1080–1087, 1995.
S. Koenig. Agent-Centered Search. Artificial Intelligence Magazine, 22, (4), 109-131, 2001.
S. Koenig, M. Likhachev and D. Furcy. Lifelong Planning A*. Artificial Intelligence, 155, (1-2), 93-146, 2004.
S. Koenig, M. Likhachev, Y. Liu and D. Furcy. Incremental Heuristic Search in Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence Magazine, 25, (2), 99-112, 2004.
J. Svennebring and S. Koenig. Building Terrain-Covering Ant Robots. Autonomous Robots, 16, (3), 313-332, 2004.
S. Koenig and M. Likhachev. Fast Replanning for Navigation in Unknown Terrain. Transactions on Robotics, 21, (3), 354-363, 2005.
M. Lagoudakis, V. Markakis, D. Kempe, P. Keskinocak, S. Koenig, A. Kleywegt, C. Tovey, A. Meyerson and S. Jain. Auction-Based Multi-Robot Routing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics: Science and Systems, 343-350, 2005.
Y. Liu and S. Koenig. Functional Value Iteration for Decision-Theoretic Planning with General Utility Functions. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 1186–1193, 2006.
External links[edit]
Articial Intelligence (AI) seeks to understand the mechanisms underlying thought and intelligent behavior, with a particular focus on their embodiment in machines. Core topics include the integrating perspective of intelligent agents and how such systems can engage in: search and problem solving; symbolic and probabilistic knowledge representation and reasoning; planning; and machine learning. The course introduces both basic concepts and algorithms, and explores how to apply these in the construction of systems that can interact intelligently with complex environments.
Target Audience
The course is intended for undergraduate students in computer science or closely related disciplines, usually in their junior year. Graduate students should take CS561 rather than CS360.
Prerequisites
The courses CSCI 104L ('Data Structures and Object-Oriented Design') and CSCI 170 ('Discrete Methods in Computer Science') are necessary prerequisites, which will not be waived. Overall, the prerequisites of CS360 include a solid understanding of data structures, algorithms and programming since you will have to be able to understand algorithms and read pseudo code. You should also know the basics of probability theory, calculus (especially derivatives) and other high-school mathematics. Finally, you should know how to program in C/C++ since the projects will use these programming languages. Do not take this class if you cannot program. The most important prerequisite of all, however, is your interest in the class, motivation, and commitment to learning. If you are not sure whether this class is for you, come and talk to us.
Readings
Most readings will be chosen from the (required) textbook, which is readily available from many standard online retailers:
The authors made extensive revisions from one edition to the next one. We therefore suggest that you buy the latest edition. Definitely do not use the first edition. We will not cover all of the chapters and, from time to time, cover topics not contained in the book.
Additional material will be provided as necessary.
Class Tools
The class web pages are maintained at http://idm-lab.org/wiki/360-Fall18/. The discussion forum is maintained at https://campuswire.com/p/GF38534E5 (you have to join with your @usc.edu email. The pass code for registering is 6127). Scores are posted on blackboard.usc.edu. Attendance is taken using the Arkaive app (https://arkaive.com).
Questionnaires
We will ask you to fill out several questionnaires for different reasons: for example, because we want to learn a bit more about you so that we can tailor the class toward your skills and expectations; because we want to evaluate certain features of the class, and because we want to improve future classes. Filling out the questionnaires is voluntary and anonymous. We hope that you will make use of this opportunity and choose to provide us with feedback. We might use information from the questionnaires in our publications.
Lectures
The about 80-minutes-long lectures (which sometimes might run a couple of minutes longer) are meant to summarize the readings and stress the important points. Thus, we expect you to read the corresponding part of the textbook before the lectures. We will post the slides directly before the corresponding lectures (see 'Schedule' on the left). We highly encourage you to take notes during the lectures and exercise sessions. If you miss a class, it is your responsibility to find out what we discussed in class, including which announcements we made in class. If there is something that you do not understand, feel free to interrupt the lecture or exercise session with questions. Your active participation in class is crucial in making the class successful. Use your colleagues as a resource (they are working toward the same goal as you are), for example, by forming study groups or posting questions on the discussion forum on Piazza that the TAs monitor on a daily basis. (We encourage you to participate actively on the discussion forum, by both asking and answering questions. If you are consistently very active in helping other students on Piazza and - this way - demonstrate your knowledge of the class material, we will consider giving you up to 1.5 percent extra credit overall, which might help you in case you end up close to a grade boundary. The TAs might not respond right away to give the students in class a chance to respond first.) If you need additional help, please feel free to go by the TAs during their office hours. The TAs are experienced and will be able to answer all of your questions, including about the textbook, lectures, projects and assignments.
Assignments
To help you prepare for the exams, we will post 'text-book style' homework assignments and their solutions. We will not collect or grade your solutions. However, solving these assignments before looking at the solutions is important as it will ensure your understanding of the material in preparation for the exams. Assignments are made available on Wednesday nights (covering the material taught in the current week), and sample solutions will be made available on Sundays. You can discuss the assignments freely with your co-students. In fact, we encourage you to form study groups to discuss the assignments and come up with solutions.
Exercises
The exercise session on Tuesday will allow you to practice the application of the material taught in the lectures via a mix of the TAs answering your questions, you solving assignment-type problems in small student groups, and the TAs discussing projects, assignments, and their solutions. The exercises will typically be 50 minutes long but please note that the midterm will be written during the exercise session as well and be 110 minutes long. There will be no exercise session during the first week of classes.
![What What](https://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/frozen/images/5/5f/Sven_at_ice_palace.png/revision/latest?cb=20141104003949)
Projects
There will be three graded two-week projects, all of which are mandatory. Most or all of the projects will involve some programming problems in C/C++ in addition to more theoretical questions. All of them have to be done individually. You are required to cite all resources you relied on for coming up with your answers. This includes people, web pages, publications and other write-ups. You are not allowed to use code or code snippets of others (that is, that you did not write yourself), unless we provided them with the projects. You are not allowed to discuss with others how to solve the projects.
Please start to work on your projects early and hand them in early. There is a grace period of 24 hours and then a linearly increasing penalty for late submissions so that submissions that are late by 96 hours (or more) after the original deadline will receive no credit. So, for example, if a project is due on Thursday at midnight, and a) you hand it in on Friday at midnight, you maximum score is 100 percent; b) you hand it in on Saturday at midnight, your maximum score is 66.66 percent; c) you hand it in on Sunday at midnight, your maximum score is 33.33 percent; and c) you hand it in on Monday at midnight, you will receive no credit for it.
Steam Subscriber Agreement We do not allow posts that break or encourage the breaking of the Steam Subscriber Agreement. Do not detail or facilitate how to break it, such as the usage of VPN's to bypass restrictions, account selling, account sharing, etc. Red dead redemption steampowered.
Exams
There will be one midterm and one final, all of which are mandatory. The exams have to be solved individually in class. The midterm will be written during the exercise session. The dates are listed in the schedule. We will determine during the first week of classes when the final will be written. No makeups will be given. The exams will be open textbook ('Artificial Intelligence - A Modern Approach' only) and open printed or hand-written (but not electronic) notes (including, but not limited to, all material posted on this wiki). All exams will be comprehensive but with a focus on material not yet tested in a previous exam. Bring a calculator and your USC ID to all exams. Using computers, cell phones or similar equipment is not allowed, not even to access electronic versions of the textbook. Exams written in pencil receive a zero score.
Attendance Requirement and Excuses
The department is conducting an experiment this semester to determine whether an attendance requirement affects student performance. There is an attendance requirement for all students, which will be lifted for some students on September 10. It will not be known before September 10 which students will have an attendance requirement afterward. The attendance requirement means that you will need to attend the lectures (for the section that you are registered for) as well as the exercises, so please ensure that you are available during these times.
If you are a student with an attendance requirement, we allow you to miss up to 5 meetings (lectures or exercises) without an excuse. We require excuses for all longer absences of 3 consecutive meetings or more as well as absences from exams. We subtract 5 percent from your total score for every absence without valid excuse beyond the 5 meeting allotment.
Even if you are not a student with an attendance requirement, we require excuses for absences from exams.
We will not accept excuses unless you provide us with a note from a doctor (or similar professional) that verifies the problem and you told us about the issue IMMEDIATELY WHEN IT AROSE (not: after it has already affected your performance in class). For example, you will need to let us know about an illness when it develops, not a couple of days before an exam when you suddenly notice that you lost so much time that you can no longer catch up with the rest of the class. We accept only true emergencies as excuses, such as your sickness or a death in your immediate family.
Images Of The Outsider Sven Computer
We are sorry that we cannot make exceptions to these rules. So, please do not ask for them.
Grades
We will not grade on a curve. Projects and exams have the following weights:
- Project 1: 10%
- Project 2: 10%
- Project 3: 10%
- Midterm: 35%
- Final: 35%
The intended grading scale is as follows.
- 95% - 100%: A+ (only in spirit; USC allows only for an A)
- 90% - 95%: A
- 85% - 90%: A-
- 80% - 85%: B+
- 75% - 80%: B
- 70% - 75%: B-
- 65% - 70%: C+
- 60% - 65%: C
- 55% - 60%: C-
- 50% - 55%: D+
- 45% - 50%: D
- 40% - 45%: D-
- 00% - 40%: F
The instructor reserves the right to adjust the grading scale.
The instructor might give students a bonus of up to 1.5 percent for frequently helping other students on the discussion forum.
The instructor will assign grades from A to F, if warranted. There will always be some students who are very close to grade boundaries. There is nothing that we will do about that. Grades are based on performance, not need or personal circumstances, and the instructor does not negotiate grades. Thus, do not take CS360 (or take it completely at your own risk) if you need a certain grade, for example, because you are graduating or because you have been conditionally admitted.
CS360 is very exam-heavy, and we do not expect extra-credit tasks to be available. To receive a good grade, you will therefore need to perform well in exams. Please check the correctness of the grading and the posted scores immediately after we announce the availability of the scores. You will need to let us know about any grading issue with an exam, project or similar within 7 days of us posting the score for that exam or project. After that time, we will no longer entertain your requests for changes to your score. If you have a grading issue, you will need to discuss the issue first with the TAs. If you cannot reach consensus, you can appeal the grading issue to the instructor. Both the TAs and the instructor might check the exam or project completely for grading issues and adjust your score up or down as appropriate.
We typically try to write the midterm before Drop Deadline 2 but, due to the distribution of the Jewish holidays, this was unfortunately not possible this time.
Academic Integrity
USC seeks to maintain an optimal learning environment. General principles of academic honesty include the concept of respect for the intellectual property of others, the expectation that individual work will be submitted unless otherwise allowed by an instructor, and the obligations both to protect one's own academic work from misuse by others as well as to avoid using another's work as one's own. All students are expected to understand and abide by these principles. We will strictly enforce the student conduct code and refer students to the Office of Student Judicial Affairs and Community Standards for further review, should there be any suspicion of academic dishonesty, and suggest that they follow the recommended sanctions in case they should find that there was academic dishonesty. We typically suggest an F as overall class grade as penalty, if asked. Scampus, the Student Guidebook, contains the student conduct code and the academic review process: https://policy.usc.edu/scampus-part-b/.
Recommendation Letters
Unfortunately, Sven currently does not write recommendation letters for students in his current or previous classes due to the insufficient administrative support provided by the department and the large class sizes of his current classes.
Problems and Concerns
At some point, you will have questions. For example, you might not be able to get code to run that we provided, there is something in the textbook that you do not understand, and so on. In this case, we encourage you to post the question on the discussion forum and see whether someone can help you. If this approach does not generate the desired result, then the TAs will be happy to help you in person. They do answer email but, unfortunately, often will not manage to answer it on the same day. (Sometimes, they will be out of town and it will take them even longer. Also, they are typically overloaded with questions on exam days or directly before.)
It is very important to us that you voice your concerns about any aspect of the class as soon as they arise. Please send an e-mail to the instructor or talk to us in person. We will accept anonymous notes (either on paper or via email from any free 'on-the-fly' email account) and treat them seriously, as long as they are sincere and constructive. Your comments will have an effect on the class, so please do not hesitate to provide them.
Artificial Intelligence is a fun topic, and we hope that all of us will have lots of fun!
Sven (yes, please feel free to call the instructor by his name) and the TAs
P.S.: As you might guess from the lengthy rules above, Sven is of German origin. His first name, though, is Scandinavian and means 'young person' or 'warrior.'
Home * People * Sven Reichard
Sven Reichard,
a German mathematician, and researcher and lecturer at TU Dresden, and before research associate at University of Western Australia, Perth[2]. He holds a Ph.D. in mathematics from University of Delaware, Newark under advisor Mikhail H. Klin[3]. His research focuses on discrete mathematics, graph theory, finite geometry and computational discrete algebra. He is co-author of the finite geometry package FinInG[4][5], written in the GAP framework[6], which also provides an interpreted programming language. Interested in computer chess programming, Sven Reichard has written the experimental Chess Engine Communication Protocol compatible chess engine Alice[7][8] (written in GAP? No C++[9]). Further, Sven Reichard is author of the Pool program Snooze, which participated at the 11th Computer Olympiad 2006 in Turin.
- 1Selected Publications
- 2Forum Posts
[10][11]
2000 ..
- Sven Reichard (2000). A Criterion for the t-Vertex Condition of Graphs. Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A
- Sven Reichard (2003). Computational and Theoretical Analysis of Coherent Configurations and Related Incidence Structure. Ph.D. thesis, University of Delaware
2005 ..
- Sven Reichard (2005). The smallest non-rank 3 graphs with the 4-vertex condition. Greifswald, Germany
- Christian Pech, Sven Reichard (2009). Enumerating Set Orbits. Algorithmic Algebraic Combinatorics and Gröbner Bases, Part 1, Springer[12]
- Maska Law, Cheryl E. Praeger, Sven Reichard (2009). Flag-transitive symmetric 2-(96, 20, 4)-designs. Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Western Australia
2010 ..
- Mikhail H. Klin, Christian Pech, Sven Reichard, Andrew Woldar, Matan Ziv-Av (2010). Examples of computer experimentation in algebraic combinatorics. Ars Mathematica Contemporanea, Vol. 3, No. 2
- Mikhail H. Klin, Sven Reichard (2013). Construction of small strongly regular designs. Trudy Instituta Matematiki i Mekhaniki UrO RAN, Vol. 19, No. 3
1999
- Re: How do you represent chess boards in your chess programms by Sven Reichard, CCC, September 29, 1999
2000 ..
- A mate for Leonid by Sven Reichard, CCC, October 10, 2001 » Leonid's Positions
- Re: About random numbers and hashing by Sven Reichard, CCC, December 05, 2001
- Re: Low weight random matricies by Sven Reichard, GAP Forum, March 21, 2002
- Gestatten: Alice by Sven Reichard, CCC, June 23, 2002
- Re: Something new about Fritz? English by Sven Reichard, CCC, June 23, 2002
- Re: Something new about Fritz? English, part 2 by Sven Reichard, CCC, June 24, 2002 » Eduard Nemeth, Fritz
- First draw against GnuChess by Sven Reichard, CCC, November 26, 2003
2005 ..
- Re: question by Sven Reichard, GAP Forum, January 30, 2008
- ↑TUD - Sven Reichard's Homepage (as of November 28, 2018, no longer available)
- ↑CMSA Inc. E-Newsletter 23, February 2007
- ↑Sven Reichard (2003). Computational and Theoretical Analysis of Coherent Configurations and Related Incidence Structure. Ph.D. thesis, University of Delaware
- ↑FinInG - a finite geometry package for GAP, Ghent University
- ↑GAP - Groups, Algorithms and Programming, Ghent University
- ↑GAP System for Computational Discrete Algebra
- ↑First draw against GnuChess by Sven Reichard, CCC, November 26, 2003
- ↑Re: Alice by Dann Corbit, Winboard Forum, March 18, 2005
- ↑Gestatten: Alice by Sven Reichard, CCC, June 23, 2002
- ↑dblp: Sven Reichard
- ↑Publications - A.J. Woldar, co-autor: Sven Reichard
- ↑Gröbner basis from Wikipedia